Home / Blogs / ian's blog
Ian Thomas Healy is an author of superhero fiction, science fiction, fantasy, and more. He is represented by Ange Tysdal of AKA Literary.
Super Guest Star Saturday 1/23/10: Sherri Cornelius
Sherri Cornelius is a dear friend of mine and a regular beta reader for me who's helped me with many of my projects. I met her three NaNoWriMos ago, when I was writing the first draft of Troubleshooters. Although she's no longer working with Eternal Press, she still has a lot to say about editing.
Observations of a Beginning Editor
So I have this editing job. So far I’ve done three shorts and one novel. I've learned some things that would benefit my author friends, so I thought I'd share in a vague, generic way.
First of all, it's not like a critique. In a critique you can say things like, "I can't follow the action in this scene," and then leave it up to the author to figure out why. That's perfectly acceptable, because as the critic you're doing the author a favor, and they'll take what you have to offer. As an editor, I have to figure out exactly what confuses me about the action, and then say that. Saying it is the hard part. If I do my job right, the solution will be obvious to the author, even if I haven't suggested a solution. Which ties in with my next point.
Editing is a balance of telling the author what to do and letting her decide how to do it. Except in the case of punctuation, where there is a right way and a wrong way; but even then if she feels strongly about leaving out a specific comma, that's ultimately her decision. I have to be very careful about rewriting anything. If I can't move around phrases she's already used to fix it, I leave a suggested fix in a comment, then she can either take my advice as is, change it another way, or tell me to take a flying leap. Although the last one on that list might be counter-productive, since I'm an impartial observer (or at least as impartial as anyone can be), and I'm only here to make her look better. Which leads to the biggest thing I’ve learned
The editor is there to correct mistakes, no doubt. But among some authors there's this attitude of, "I’m not required to know how to punctuate. That's what editors are for." Let me take a moment to point out I've not yet edited an author with this attitude, but I've seen it around in the blogosphere. But let me tell you something, dear authors, this attitude is stupid. STUPID. If my harsh words pull one author away from this abyss, they will be worth it. Not only is it good to know your craft inside and out for your craft's sake, but there are other, more subtle reasons for knowing the nuts and bolts, and then putting them into practice BEFORE sending it to your editor.
Your potential publishers think highly of someone who knows his craft. Having a clean manuscript increases your chances of being accepted in the first place.
If you acquire an editor and send subsequent works straight to her, don’t feel like you can slack off. If I have your manuscript for 20 days, and I spend the full 20 helping you polish your words, you are going to have one tight, well-written book. A tight, well-written book will increase your reputation, generate better word-of-mouth, ergo selling more books and creating more fans. However, if I have to spend seven of those days correcting errors which could easily have been found before the ms came to me, then you are getting only 13 days of word polishing. We might only have time for plot and eliminating confusion, and very little time for word choices and flow. Deadlines can be changed if need be, but the book is still going to suffer, and so will your relationship with your editor.
So those are the observations I have so far. I'm sure I'll have more as I go along, and maybe even change my mind about some of those up there. (Except for the last one. Since I basically called everyone who doesn't agree with me an idiot I'll have to stick by it. It's true anyway.) I'm getting the education of a lifetime, being on this side of things.
Sherri Cornelius writes fantasy novels and is represented by the Sara Camilli Agency. Still looking for a publisher, she thought it could help to know the business side of things, so she applied for an editing job. Eternal Press hired her to edit erotica earlier this year, but publishing being publishing, only one of her projects has been released so far. Sherri lives in Oklahoma with husband, kids, and gerbil. Visit her at Sherri Blossoms.
- ian's blog
- Login or register to post comments
All content on this site is ©2002-2010 by Ian Thomas Healy
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at www.ianthealy.com


Good article, Sherri!
I have had some experience with the "I don't need to know proper punctuation" people in some of my editing projects, only it was more like, "I don't care if it's proper, I prefer it that way so don't change it," which is REALLY hard not just as an editor, but also as a writer. One gentleman I worked with insisted on semi-colons in nearly every sentence. Because this was magazine copy and he's British and apparently they use semi-colons far more often over there, I had to leave them intact wherever I could, even when the readability of the sentences (because they were a paragraph long) was utterly nil. None of the editorial advice I gave him about this (such as, "This magazine is being distributed in America as well as the U.K. and people may not be able to read it this way) was convincing. He wanted me to only correct spelling and genuinely "wrong" things and not correct the flow. It made my job faster in the end, but not nearly as satisfying.
That has always been my hardest lessons with editing. When someone says "I only want a proofread" and sticking with the strict nuts and bolts, when you know it can benefit from a thorough line edit as well. I feel almost like I'm doing them a disservice. Though in a previous project, I line edited the first twenty pages of a manuscript and proofread the rest upon request for someone so she could see what a line edit generally looks like (sometimes...no check that USUALLY...a person can't really conceptualize what a good edit can do for their work until they actually see it) and she liked it so much that she paid me the extra to line edit the rest of it.
I would like the experience as you have had, though, of editing for a publisher. Doing it freelance, you sort of get used to running things your own way, but you get no concept of how it's done in the real world. Little glimpses like this help.
Thank you! (I'm thinking you're Allie, though you aren't identified.) My hardest lesson with the editing job was finding I couldn't get it perfect. They assigned me a manuscript, and I worked with the author to polish it as best I could, but I realized that's just part of it. They'll never be perfect.
Yanno, if you folks would just log in when you comment, they'd post immediately and under your names, not as "Anonymous." Then you don't have to wait for me to approve them!
My problem is thinking I'm ALREADY logged in. lol And look, I'm logged in now! :)
http://www.allisonmdickson.com
http://www.allisonedits.com
http://www.twitter.com/msallied